Flutter vs. Angular vs. React: Find Your Ideal App Development Framework
When developing modern applications, the framework used may either ease or frustrate developers. There are many available options for developers today. However, some of the versatile, supportive, and performing frameworks out there are Flutter, Angular, and React.
Each differentiates itself in terms of what features it offers in relation to advantages and what may constitute challenges. In this blog, we will discuss Flutter vs. Angular vs. React and enable you to decide which one is best for app development needs.
Flutter vs. Angular vs. React: Overview of the Frameworks
What is Flutter?
Flutter is an open-source, absolutely free-to-use UI toolkit launched by Google. It is used majorly to develop natively compiled applications for mobile, web, and desktop from a single codebase. It was launched in 2017. This has acquired a number of eyeballs worldwide with cross-platform features and modern, smooth user interfaces.
What is Angular?
Angular is a full-fledged framework developed by Google based on TypeScript. It was launched in 2010 when it was presented as AngularJS. Angular is mostly used for SPAs (single-page applications), though. It provides a complete solution for web application development in terms of two-way data binding, dependency injection, and reusable components, to name but a few of its powerful features.
What is React?
React is a JavaScript library for UI development. Developed by Facebook, now Meta, it was announced in 2013. It lets developers build reusable UI components, which is why this technology is so widely applied to the development of dynamic and fast-loading web applications. Although developers often combine this technology with other tools to build full-fledged applications, the core focus of React lies within the "View" part of the MVC architecture.
[Also Read - Essential Guide to Developing Mobile Apps for Your Business ]
Flutter vs. Angular vs. React: Key Features and Functionality
Feature | Flutter | Angular | React |
---|---|---|---|
Programming Language | Dart | TypeScript (a superset of JavaScript) | JavaScript |
Platform Supports | Cross-platform (iOS, Android, web, desktop, embedded) | Web, mobile (via Ionic/NativeScript) | Web, mobile (via React Native) |
UI Development Approach | Declarative, widget-based | Component-based, data binding | Component-based, virtual DOM |
Performance | Generally considered high due to its direct-to-platform rendering | Can be optimized with techniques like Ahead-of-Time compilation, but might have some overhead | Known for its efficient virtual DOM updates |
Ecosystem | A growing ecosystem with a large community and package repository (Pub) | A mature ecosystem with a vast array of libraries and tools | Massive ecosystem with a rich collection of libraries and frameworks |
Learning Curve | Relatively easy for developers with a background in object-oriented programming | Can be steeper due to its TypeScript syntax and dependency injection concepts | Generally considered easier to learn for developers familiar with JavaScript |
Google's Backing | Yes, Flutter is a Google product | Yes, Angular is developed and maintained by Google | No, React is developed and maintained by Meta (formerly Facebook) |
Typical Use Cases | Mobile apps, web apps, desktop apps, embedded systems | Enterprise web applications, single-page applications | Web applications, mobile apps, cross-platform development |
[Also Read - NestJS vs ExpressJS: How to Choose the Right Framework? ]
1. Speed and Productivity of Development
Flutter: Faster and Sharp
It shines with speed and productivity. Thanks to "hot reload," developers can see code changes reflected in the app immediately, with no need to restart the entire thing. This definitely improves the speed of Flutter mobile application development. Flutter also boasts a single codebase for Android and iOS apps, so developers do not have to write separate code for different platforms.
Alibaba employed Flutter to develop mobile applications, ensuring a centralized experience across different platforms, reducing development time and resources, etc.
Angular: Structured yet Complex
It is known for having a rigid structure. This can be considered either as an advantage or as a disadvantage. It provides a solidly structured framework, and it will easily support large applications.
However, because Angular is so rich in features, it often comes with a long curve at the beginning, especially for newcomer developers. Adding an extra layer of complexity through the usage of TypeScript often makes the development curve slow down when your team is not familiar with it.
Angular is a technology largely used in developing enterprise applications. Companies like Microsoft apply Angular for large enterprise applications, such as web applications, that relate to complex functionality and scalability.
React: Flexible and Popular
Because of its component-based architecture, React is very modular and also very reusable. You can develop modules and then upgrade modules in isolation without needing more time for integration. Hot reload exists, but it is not as ideal as Flutter. React will be flexible, letting developers merge with other libraries or tools, further optimizing productivity depending on the project requirements.
Facebook heavily uses React in its web applications; one example is its main website, Instagram. React is fully capable of handling large-scale, high-traffic applications.
2. Performance
Flutter: Near-Native Performance
Because a Flutter application is compiled directly to native machine code via Dart, its performance is typically very close to that of native apps. This makes apps requiring a lot of performance, such as gaming or graphic-heavy applications, much easier to attain and deploy. Flutter also employs its own rendering engine, meaning the UI will be consistent across various platforms.
The e-commerce giant Alibaba used Flutter to ensure that mobile apps ran well and did not compromise the smoothness of the applications without making the application lose its sleek and consistent user interface.
Angular: Not as fast on mobile
The basic reason Angular applications tend to be heavier than React or Flutter is that they are obviously very complex. Angular does great in web applications, especially SPAs, but its performance may not be so great in mobile apps unless a tool like Ionic is used to build a hybrid app. For mobile, huge initial loads of Angular applications are quite terrible.
Many corporate applications, such as Google's internal tools, are implemented in Angular because performance is less of an issue with internal web applications than it is with mobile applications.
React: Fast but dependent upon all additional external libraries.
Applications developed in React are very performant, taking into account optimizations such as virtual DOM, which only updates the part of the web page that needs to be updated. However, React itself is just a UI library, so performance is not its sole responsibility. It would depend on what tools or libraries are involved in this case. For example, with state management libraries such as Redux, performance will decline greatly, especially when releasing really large applications.
Netflix built its web app using React, citing fast rendering and excellent performance, particularly on slow internet connections.
3. Community and Support
Flutter: Still small and Limited
Though Flutter is a new phenomenon, its community is picking up very fast. Backed by Google, Flutter has excellent documentation and a brilliant developer support system. It's still younger than Angular and React, so its ecosystem isn't mature yet. There are fewer third-party libraries and tools available, but it is catching up as Flutter grows in popularity.
Angular: A Well-Stocked Pantry
The Angular ecosystem is one of the most mature and solidly established in the world of app development. With more than ten years of development, it boasts an extremely massive community with tens of thousands of resources and an overwhelming variety of third-party libraries. Google's ownership of the product also provides long-term support and steady updates.
Most enterprise-grade applications are built in Angular, which has a strong ecosystem and long-term support. Some of the very popular applications, like Google Cloud Console and Google Ads, were built on Angular.
React: The Largest Community
React has one of the largest developer communities among web frameworks. It is used in a wide range of industries, and the massive ecosystem ensures that most needs can be met by finding some library or tool. Because it is so popular, there are countless tutorials, docs, documentation, and third-party libraries, which can be overwhelming when trying to begin.
Such scalability, combined with the powerful backing of its community, makes React the top choice for technology heavyweights Facebook, Airbnb, and WhatsApp.
4. Use Cases
Flutter: Mobile-Centric
Flutter is a good choice when you mostly work on mobile applications, such as applications that you will have to produce for iOS and Android. Although it is rapidly being adopted for web and desktop applications, it shines most at the mobile level.
Google Ads is an ideal mobile-first app built with Flutter. Its clean and responsive UI is also available on all devices.
Angular: Web Applications Centric
If you have complex, large-scale web applications that imply a lot of business logic, it is better to develop them on Angular. Its features are designed to handle full-fledged complexity well, especially when it is used for SPAs.
For instance, Google Cloud Console's cloud resources management web application is made with Angular.
React: Scalable for Web and Mobile Both
That makes React ideal for any application of any complexity, both web and mobile software. Not constrained to web development, with React Native, the same codebase can be used to develop mobile applications. That's why startups and companies that plan to develop applications for both web and mobile platforms simultaneously tend to be attracted to it.
Airbnb used React Native for its mobile app for several reasons, among which were the ability to share code across platforms and the speed at which new features were possible.
[Also Read - Tailwind vs Bootstrap: Which CSS Framework is Right for Your Project? ]
Conclusion
So, Flutter vs. Angular vs. React: Which is best? There's no single, simplistic answer to this-what actually works best for you depends on your needs and the nature of your project:
- If you need a cross-platform solution for both web and mobile with near-native performance, Flutter is probably the best fit.
- If you are interested in developing a complex, large-scale web application, Angular offers the most complete, mature solution.
- If you want flexibility, the largest community support, and the ability to develop both web and mobile applications, React is the best option.
Ultimately, which one should I choose- Flutter vs. Angular vs. React? All of them depend upon the project goals, the expertise of your development team, and the features that you might be looking out for the most. After knowing each framework's good and bad points, the decision should guide you into an informed choice and set your journey toward app development success.
Frequently Asked Questions
Read more blogs
Time and Cost of Developing an AI like ChatGPT: Key Factors Explored
Explore the factors influencing the time and cost of developing an AI model like ChatGPT. Understand key considerations for successful AI ap
Guide to Successful Real Estate App Development: Features, Technologies, and More
Explore the advantages of developing a real estate app, key features, technologies to employ, and the importance of collaborating with a Rea
Custom vs. Template-Based Website Development: A Comprehensive Cost Comparison Guide
Explore the costs, pros, and cons of custom website development vs. template-based solutions. Make an informed decision for your online pres